On 11/13/2017 12:32 PM, Mark Rofail wrote:
> == The @>> operator
> I would argue that allocating an array of datums and building an
> array would have the same complexity
>
>
> I am not sure what you mean here. Just because something has the
> same complexity does not mean there can't be major performance
> differences.
>
> I have spend a lot of time working on this operator and would like to
> benefit from it. How should I go about this ? Start a new patch ?
I am still not sure what you mean here. Feel free to add @>> to this
patch if you like. You may want to submit it as two patch files (but
please keep them as the same commitfest entry) but I leave that decision
all up to you.
> So the two main issues we remain to resolve are MATCH FULL and the
> RI_Initial_Check() query refactoring. The problem is that I am not one
> of the original authors and have not touched this part of the code.
> I understand the problem but it will take some time for me to understand
> how to resolve everything.
Cool, feel free to ask if you need some assistance. I want this patch.
Andreas
