Re: initdb change - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: initdb change
Date
Msg-id 48B2F240.9030302@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb change  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: initdb change
List pgsql-hackers

Joshua Drake wrote:
>>
>> Is there some reason why initdb shouldn't just Do The Right Thing™
>> when it finds an empty extant $PGDATA/pg_xlog directory that passes
>> the same tests an empty extant $PGDATA would?
>>     
>
> That is what I was suggesting.
>
>   
>   

Why should the xlog directory be treated specially? We don't do this for 
any other subdirectory of PGDATA. The extra logic would be a nuisance 
and for no great gain in functionality that I can see.

This whole discussion springs from a misconception apparently, so let's 
just move on.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing
Next
From: Joshua Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb change