Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 12:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
>> I'm not clear on what you're proposing. There is no such thing as an
>> opclass with no operators (or at least, not a useful one), so this seems
>> mutually contradictory.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
>
> You're right, that's my mistake, sorry. So, having casting rules seems
> to be the only option..
>
We can already cast as text[], and so we can do this:
andrew=# select
xpath('//foo/text()','<a><foo>1</foo><foo>2</foo></a>')::text[]::int[];xpath
-------{1,2}
(1 row)
So why do we desperately need anything extra at all?
cheers
andrew
