Ah yes, is that in pg_types, good idea, I might override that after I make
the query.
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:42:29 -0400,
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>> The SQL spec doesn't allow unconstrained lengths for these types
>> so it gives no guidance about what to display in the information_schema
>> views. Any opinions?
>
> It might make some sense to use the maximum length supported by the type
> for the precision. The documentations says that numeric is limited to
> 1000 digits.
>
> If there isn't a set scale for the type, then NULL would probably make the
> most sense.
>
