Re: Bind message - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Markus Schaber
Subject Re: Bind message
Date
Msg-id 4518E986.3030801@logix-tt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bind message  (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>)
Responses Re: Bind message  (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Hi, Oliver,

Oliver Jowett wrote:

>> I remember having read something about delaying the actual planning
>> until the first parameterset arrives.

> The server only does this when you use the unnamed statement (i.e.
> before the driver's prepareThreshold is reached), because the resulting
> plan is only really useful for that particular set of parameter values,
> and using a named statement implies that you want to reuse the
> parse/plan results for other parameter values.

Ah. But usually, the other parameter values for the same prepared
statement produce similar query plans, because they're the same use case
on similar data.

So, at least for most of the apps we're running here, the first set of
parameters makes more sense than planning without any parameters.

Maybe this behaviour should be configurable via some session
configuration variable?

And for applications that really have two very different usecases
resulting in identical prepared statements, it's affordable to either
switch the delayed planning of, or to prepare the statement twice, with
different names and different first parameter sets.

Maybe we should crosspost this to pg_hackers?

Markus

--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea memory improvement
Next
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Small problem with embedded comments in a statement