Re: Certification Available +Pronounce - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Robert Cleary |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Certification Available +Pronounce |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4342A9D8.30902@ul.ie Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Certification Available +Pronounce (Robert Cleary <robert.cleary@ul.ie>) |
Responses |
Re: Certification Available +Pronounce
|
List | pgsql-advocacy |
David Fetter wrote: >On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 04:51:01PM +0100, Robert Cleary wrote: > > >>David Fetter wrote: >> >> >>>On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:39:30AM +0100, Robert Cleary wrote: >>> >>> >>>>1) Is there a PostgreSQL equivalent certification to the MySQL >>>>Core Certification (btw drawn #8 in certcites.com hottest 05 >>>>certifications list) >>>>http://certcities.com/editorial/features/print.asp?EditorialsID=86, >>>>If not, maybe this could be another target to increase pg's >>>>popularity? >>>> >>>> >>>I'm not sure I understand this question. Could you explain what >>>purposes and whose interests such a certification, if it existed, >>>would serve? >>> >>>Cheers, >>>D >>> >>> >>> >>Well, if those completely-new to databases - see, that outside of >>Microsoft Access, SQL Server, and Oracle - MySQL is the most widely >>downloaded _open-source_ solution >>(http://www.mysql.com/why-mysql/marketshare/); and also, that, by >>learning to become proficient in this, they can also get a >>certification (recognised by managers etc.) - then, why not become a >>mysql guru. >> >> > >If this certification makes a person a "MySQL guru," that's great for >MySQL AB, the corporation, especially in meeting their fiduciary >responsibility to their shareholders. > >However, in my experience, there is, if anything, a fairly strong >*negative* correllation between actual skills and acquiring >certifications. It is far from obvious to me that stamping out a >bunch of "Certified PostgreSQL Professionals" would do any good to >PostgreSQL project, however profitable it might be to the certifying >authority. > > > >>My point being, that with the latest developments with pgsql, and >>the media awareness EnterpriseDB has brought by winning the >>SanFrancisco LinuxWorld 05 Best-Database-Solution award, people will >>begin to become aware of pgsql, as a more advanced open-source >>solution with all the readily seen advantages thereof. >> >> > >Those marketing advantages can quite quickly vanish, or even go >turn into a liability, should a cadre of incompetents brandishing >certificates appear. > > > >>Now, if I can also get certified in that, then why not go for pgsql >>instead. >> >> > >See above. > > > >>The more DB beginners going for pgsql the better for it's future, >>no? >> >> > >Not when those beginners are labeled "professionals." > >Cheers, >D > > Fair-point!, the only reason I came to this query - is that i'm currently looking up proffessional certifications at work; there is also mixed opinions about certifications for most other IT areas. I agree with you, a certification doesn't tell much - experience is allways the telling-point someones ability; but when you hear that some one is CISCO certified proffessional, or Sun Certified Java programmer, or Red Hat Certified Engineer for example - a certain air of respect carries with these titles. I'm of the opinion, that good certifications are worth while, and provide a foundation on which quality of design - and work - results etc., but then certain-people have this ability naturaly, by interest and dedication.
pgsql-advocacy by date: