Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl
Date
Msg-id 42F9744D.5000408@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl  (Sean Davis <sdavis2@mail.nih.gov>)
Responses Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl
List pgsql-interfaces
>>
>>Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go?
> 
> 
> DBD::Pg is the way to go, for numerous reasons.  DBI is very well supported.
> More importantly, almost all database-related work is done by building on
> DBI.  Interfacing your own code with those of others is then relatively
> straightforward.  See, for some examples, DBIx::RecordSet or Class::DBI.
> Finally, if you every need to port to another database product (GASP!), DBI
> is fairly easy to adapt (depending on DB-specific SQL).

DBI/DBD is also what Perl considers standard.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> Sean
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings



pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting results after networking error
Next
From: jtv@xs4all.nl
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting results after networking error