Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From David
Subject Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl
Date
Msg-id 20050810202214.GA1935@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-interfaces
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:28:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> >>Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go?

> >DBD::Pg is the way to go, for numerous reasons.  DBI is very well 
> >supported.

> DBI/DBD is also what Perl considers standard.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Joshua D. Drake

Well, it's still unanimous, and coming from people who have my respect.

Spent yesterday reading the DBD::Pg mailing list.  Now plan on studying
the manpages for DBD and for DBI.  It shouldn't be much of a chore
rewriting what little I've done so far into DBI code.

Thanks again to everyone who replied.  Maybe I've already said it, but I
thought I was seeing just what all of you have said, but just wasn't
sure.


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: John DeSoi
Date:
Subject: Re: Connect to a PostgreSQL-Server by TCP/IP
Next
From: jtv@xs4all.nl
Date:
Subject: Re: Getting oid with libpq