Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
Date
Msg-id 42A639C3.40606@samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine  (Tom Arthurs <tarthurs@jobflash.com>)
Responses Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
List pgsql-performance
Tom Arthurs wrote:
> Yes, shared buffers in postgres are not used for caching

Shared buffers in Postgres _are_ used for caching, they just form a
secondary cache on top of the kernel's IO cache. Postgres does IO
through the filesystem, which is then cached by the kernel. Increasing
shared_buffers means that less memory is available for the kernel to
cache IO -- increasing shared_buffers has been shown to be a net
performance loss beyond a certain point. Still, there is value in
shared_buffers as it means we can avoid a read() system call for hot
pages. We can also do better buffer replacement in the PG shared buffer
than the kernel can do (e.g. treating IO caused by VACUUM specially).

> My biggest challenge with solaris/sparc is trying to reduce context
> switching.

It would be interesting to see if this is improved with current sources,
as Tom's bufmgr rewrite should have hopefully have reduced this problem.

-Neil

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: slow growing table
Next
From: John A Meinel
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine