Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Arthurs
Subject Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
Date
Msg-id 42A72047.6030304@jobflash.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
List pgsql-performance
I just puhsd 8.0.3 to production on Sunday, and haven't had a time to
really monitor it under load, so I can't tell if it's helped the context
switch problem yet or not.

Neil Conway wrote:
> Tom Arthurs wrote:
>
>> Yes, shared buffers in postgres are not used for caching
>
>
> Shared buffers in Postgres _are_ used for caching, they just form a
> secondary cache on top of the kernel's IO cache. Postgres does IO
> through the filesystem, which is then cached by the kernel. Increasing
> shared_buffers means that less memory is available for the kernel to
> cache IO -- increasing shared_buffers has been shown to be a net
> performance loss beyond a certain point. Still, there is value in
> shared_buffers as it means we can avoid a read() system call for hot
> pages. We can also do better buffer replacement in the PG shared buffer
> than the kernel can do (e.g. treating IO caused by VACUUM specially).
>
>> My biggest challenge with solaris/sparc is trying to reduce context
>> switching.
>
>
> It would be interesting to see if this is improved with current sources,
> as Tom's bufmgr rewrite should have hopefully have reduced this problem.
>
> -Neil
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bjoern Metzdorf
Date:
Subject: Re: Help specifying new web server/database machine
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Help specifying new web server/database machine