Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Date
Msg-id 418B7302.8080803@samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
List pgsql-hackers
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Right but we can create a new segment and use it too. I don't know how
> these segments are used but I used to do it in the past, of course you have
> to create a memory manager that handle not ccntinuous segments.

The TelegraphCQ folks have already done this:
  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00336.php

I haven't had a chance to look at the patch, though.

-Neil


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: CVS should die
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die