Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Date
Msg-id 418B7696.3050302@bigfoot.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:> Gaetano Mendola wrote:>>> Right but we can create a new segment and use it too. I don't know how>>
thesesegments are used but I used to do it in the past, of course you>> have>> to create a memory manager that handle
notccntinuous segments.>>> The TelegraphCQ folks have already done this:>>
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00336.php>>I haven't had a chance to look at the patch,
though.

Not bad, however that post is more than one year old. Implement a resizable
shared memory could really improve postgres performances ?



Regards
Gaetano Mendola




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die