Re: Very slow viewing of large table. - Mailing list pgadmin-support

From Constantin Stefanov
Subject Re: Very slow viewing of large table.
Date
Msg-id 3F97754F.2040004@mail.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Very slow viewing of large table.  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgadmin-support
Dave Page wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Constantin Stefanov [mailto:cstef@mail.ru] 
>>Sent: 22 October 2003 14:53
>>To: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
>>Subject: [pgadmin-support] Very slow viewing of large table.
>>
>>When in PgAdmin3 I click on a large table, it waits before 
>>opening it. 
>>As far as I could understand, it issues a row count on a 
>>table. Is there way to stop this behaviour?
>>I found a letter about the same problem of February 2002, and 
>>Dave Page wrote he was intending to do something about.
>>Am I searching in the wrong place or there is no capability 
>>for cancelling count queries?
> 
> Under File -> Options -> Query there is an option to control this
> behaviour, though unless you have a slow server, it should have a
> sensible value following install. From the helpfile:
> 
> "Count rows if estimated less than" - In the object browser, if the
> estimated number of rows in a table (as read from the table statistics)
> is below this limit, a SELECT count(*) will be performed to find the
> exact value.
Thanks, I set that value to 0, and now I have the desired behaviour.
But, for that table the values are:
Rows(estimated) - 7
Rows(counted) - 77204608
I think the difference is too large. From the debug output I could not 
understand the query which pg_admin issues to have the value for 
estimated number of rows. Could you show me that query so I could give 
it directly from psql to see whether there is an error in my database 
stats or there is a bug in pg_admin when interpreting query result?

-- 
Constantin Stefanov



pgadmin-support by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgAdmin III error when connecting to server
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Very slow viewing of large table.