Re: Update of foreign key values - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dennis Gearon
Subject Re: Update of foreign key values
Date
Msg-id 3F390636.8020403@cvc.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update of foreign key values  ("Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org>)
Responses Re: Update of foreign key values  ("Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org>)
List pgsql-general
Yuup, always name constraints so it's easier to remove them. And if you name them meaningfully, then others might
understandwhy they exist! (or later after a coffeeless morning) 

Roderick A. Anderson wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
>
>>Yes. Either DEFERRABLE or INITIALLY DEFERRED must be given in order for
>>set constraints to be meaningful. This might be another good place to
>>consider a little clarification (or maybe a doc note in the interactive
>>docs)
>
>
> Phew.  I thought I was going bonkers.  Then add that I never named the
> constraints so I was still out'a luck.
>
>
> Rod


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/C functions
Next
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Re: Commercial support?