Re: Update of foreign key values - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Roderick A. Anderson
Subject Re: Update of foreign key values
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33.0308120720010.20635-100000@main.cyber-office.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update of foreign key values  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
Responses Re: Update of foreign key values  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
Re: Update of foreign key values  (Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:

> Yes. Either DEFERRABLE or INITIALLY DEFERRED must be given in order for
> set constraints to be meaningful. This might be another good place to
> consider a little clarification (or maybe a doc note in the interactive
> docs)

Phew.  I thought I was going bonkers.  Then add that I never named the
constraints so I was still out'a luck.


Rod
--
  "Open Source Software - Sometimes you get more than you paid for..."


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.4Beta1 "failed to create socket: Address family not
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp with zero precision