Re: Update of foreign key values - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: Update of foreign key values
Date
Msg-id 20030812080954.A11777-100000@megazone.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update of foreign key values  ("Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> > Yes. Either DEFERRABLE or INITIALLY DEFERRED must be given in order for
> > set constraints to be meaningful. This might be another good place to
> > consider a little clarification (or maybe a doc note in the interactive
> > docs)
>
> Phew.  I thought I was going bonkers.  Then add that I never named the
> constraints so I was still out'a luck.

Well, the constraint still got an autogenerated name, so you probably
could have used that, although you might end up affecting more constraints
than you had meant.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Re: types of constraint deferment
Next
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/C functions