Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haroldo Stenger
Subject Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 3C61AEC6.C2DC3B6B@adinet.com.uy
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  (Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers@dynworks.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> The thing is, there are several areas where using threads would be a
> benefit, from what I've read on this list over the years ... as time goes
> on, less and less of the OSs in use dont' have threads, so we have to
> start *somewhere* to work towards that sort of hybrid system ...

Yes.

But, maybe things like full-fledged replication, savepoints/nested transactions,
out-of-transaction-scope cursors, and others must have priority over this; and
that mutating PG thread safe, will slow down a 7.3 release a lot, something not
wanted by many here.

Let's make a pro cons list of thread related aspectcs here. We saw a lot of
cons. Write some pros explicitely. We're not in a hurry anyway.

Regards,
Haroldo,


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haroldo Stenger
Date:
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Next
From: Haroldo Stenger
Date:
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server