Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 200202070228.SAA15249@mail.ucsd.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  (Haroldo Stenger <hstenger@adinet.com.uy>)
Responses Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  (<mkscott@sacadia.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Let's make a pro cons list of thread related aspectcs here. We saw a lot of
> cons. Write some pros explicitely. We're not in a hurry anyway.

I think in addition to pros/cons, an important question is:
How has threading influenced other DBMS's? I know MySQL uses threading, at 
least in the development version; how much has it helped? Is the utility of a 
database based partly on the presence of threading? Take Oracle, MsSQL, and 
others; which have threading and which seem to gain from threading?

I don't follow the other DB's as closely, so I don't know the answers.

I suspect that looking at other databases will give us a clue about the 
magnitude of the pros, rather than just the areas of influence.

Regards,Jeff


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Next
From: Haroldo Stenger
Date:
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server