Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Haroldo Stenger writes:
>
> > Though, starting to think & code thread safe would be nice too.
>
> The thing about thread-safeness is that it's only actually useful when
> you're using threads. Otherwise it wastes everybody's time -- the
> programmer's, the computer's, and the user's.
Yes I see. The scenario under which I see doing it to be useful, is thinking in
adding multi-threading for PG v 7.5 say, and preparing the road. But maybe it's
a worthless effort. Many developers are pointing it. Let's forget about threads
for now.
By the way, my original question about how integrated the multi-threading fork
reached, remained unanswered. I will assume it went threading, dropping forever
the original behaviour, so deciding me towards not considering threading a
viable option (for now).
Regards,
Haroldo.
