Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From
Subject Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.10.10202061456510.2321-100000@goldengate.kojoworldwide.com.
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  (Haroldo Stenger <hstenger@adinet.com.uy>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Haroldo Stenger wrote:

> 
> By the way, my original question about how integrated the multi-threading fork
> reached, remained unanswered. I will assume it went threading, dropping forever
> the original behaviour, so deciding me towards not considering threading a
> viable option (for now).

Yes, you can use postmaster and fork for a connection...or at least you
could prior to some recent changes.  I haven't tested it that way for
awhile but it should work.


Myron
mkscott@sacadia.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Haroldo Stenger
Date:
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [Fwd: MS SQL compatible functions]