Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Date
Msg-id 36539166.A9FEAA7E@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to PREPARE  ("Taral" <taral@cyberjunkie.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE  (Michael Meskes <meskes@usa.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> But wouldn't it be more useful to preprocess the query and store the
> resulting nodes instead? We don't want to parse the statement 
> everytime a variable binding comes in.

Sure. Sorry I wasn't being very specific. Also, whoever implements it
gets to do it either way at first :)

btw, I'm buried in trying to get a CASE statement to work, so am not
volunteering for this one...
                    - Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More on 6.4 on DEC Alpha + Digital Unix 4.0d + DEC C compiler
Next
From: Oleg Broytmann
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More on 6.4 on DEC Alpha + Digital Unix 4.0d + DEC C compiler