Re: [HACKERS] More on 6.4 on DEC Alpha + Digital Unix 4.0d + DEC C compiler - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More on 6.4 on DEC Alpha + Digital Unix 4.0d + DEC C compiler
Date
Msg-id 36538DB4.84A103F3@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to More on 6.4 on DEC Alpha + Digital Unix 4.0d + DEC C compiler  ("Pedro J. Lobo" <pjlobo@euitt.upm.es>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] More on 6.4 on DEC Alpha + Digital Unix 4.0d + DEC C compiler
Re: [HACKERS] More on 6.4 on DEC Alpha + Digital Unix 4.0d + DEC C compiler
List pgsql-hackers
> 1) THE REGRESSION TEST FOR FLOAT8 IS BROKEN!!!
> the "expected" output for the exp() operator ":" is brain damaged.

The reference platform never lies. Better figure out how to break your
machine instead :)

> 2) The tests for char, varchar, select_implicit, select_having and 
> rules fail when locale is enabled, and pass when locale is disabled. 
> This is due to character comparisons being case insensitive when 
> locale is enabled. I don't think this is the correct behaviour. I'd 
> appreciate any hint on where to look to investigate this further.

src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c

> 3) The int8 type is completely brain damaged on my system. The output 
> from any select that gets an int8 is '4831823328'. Pointers?

It should be easy to fix, since you have a real 64-bit machine. Sorry
I've lost access to my DUnix-4.0 boxes so can't help directly. Look at
what configure decided your int8 setup should be.

> 4) ...
> 5) ...

Both are solved with platform-specific "expected" results (as would the
exp "failure" earlier, though it should be fixed on the reference
platform).

> 7) The abstime, tinterval and horology tests fail. It seems to be 
> caused by incorrect handling of the daylight savings. However, the 
> output seems to be "less incorrect" than on previous versions.

This has always been due to conflicts between the two styles of
date/time support on Unix boxes. Perhaps it isn't being configured
correctly?
                   - Tom


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in 6.4 release
Next
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE