Occams razor says it's PostGIS. However, I'm concerned about how old
the code being run is. In particular, the library underneath PostGIS,
GEOS, had a *lot* of memory work done on it over the last year. I'd
like to see if things improve if you upgrade to GEOS 3.2.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Frans Hals <fhals7@googlemail.com> writes:
>> Operation is now running for around 13 hrs.
>> Two postmaster processes above 1% memory usage are running.
>
>> One of them uses constantly 26.5% of memory.
>> The other one is growing:
>> After 1 hr 25%
>> After 9 hrs 59%
>> After 13 hrs 64%
>
> Well, it's pretty clear that you've found a memory leak, but that was
> what we thought before; this data doesn't move us any closer to a fix.
> In particular it's not possible to guess whether the leak should be
> blamed on Postgres or Postgis code. Even if we knew that, I'm not
> sure we could fix the leak without tracing through actual execution.
>
> Can you generate a self-contained test case that exhibits similar bloat?
> I would think it's probably not very dependent on the specific data in
> the column, so a simple script that constructs a lot of random data
> similar to yours might be enough, if you would rather not show us your
> real data.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
