On 4/14/25 08:49, Richard Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 4:50 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hence, I propose the attached patch for the fix.
>>
>> BTW, there is a XXX comment there saying that maybe we can make the
>> remaining join quals part of the inner scan's filter instead of the
>> join filter. I don't think this is possible in all cases. In the
>> above query, 'coalesce(t2.b) = t3.b' cannot be made part of t3's scan
>> filter, according to join_clause_is_movable_into. So I removed that
>> comment in the patch while we're here.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Here is an updated patch with a commit message. Regarding
> backporting, I'm inclined not to, given the lack of field reports.
> Any objections to pushing it?
No objections.
By the way, I think you should be less shy about adding to CC people who
have been involved in the discussion (at least David should have a
chance to know). Also, don't hesitate to use the 'Reviewed-by' tag to
let people know who else may remember the context of the problem, just
in case.
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov
