Dear Michael,
> 93bc3d75d8e1 has introduced a couple of new injection points, but
> these don't follow the convention in-place where points are named
> more-or-less-like-that. Please find attached a patch to make all
> these more consistent.
I have no objections for the patch, but I feel there are no concrete naming rules
(I confused while creating patches). Can we clarify that? E.g., first term should
be a module or process, or something like that.
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
