On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:13:44AM +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> I have no objections for the patch, but I feel there are no concrete naming rules
> (I confused while creating patches).
There has been a sort of implied rule in the code to use lower
characters, with terms separated by dashes. Perhaps we could make
that more official with an extra sentence in the docs about that.
> Can we clarify that? E.g., first term should be a module or process,
> or something like that.
Not sure that it would be a good thing to put context-specific
restrictions here.
Anyway, would you like to propose a patch for the documentation?
--
Michael
