Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: C vs. C++ contributions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: C vs. C++ contributions
Date
Msg-id 28460.1027351772@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to C vs. C++ contributions  (Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub@richlava.com>)
Responses Re: C vs. C++ contributions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub@richlava.com> writes:
> never any mention of C++ (libpq++ excepted). So, at a risk of stating 
> the obvious (and I'm 99.99% sure I am), does backend code need to be 
> submitted as C even if it's for an entirely NEW module?

Backend code must be C; we do not want to deal with C++ portability
issues.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE/DROP OPERATOR CLASS
Next
From: Tony Reina
Date:
Subject: Re: Inheritance a burden?