Re: C vs. C++ contributions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: C vs. C++ contributions
Date
Msg-id 200207232316.g6NNGTW10341@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C vs. C++ contributions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub@richlava.com> writes:
> > never any mention of C++ (libpq++ excepted). So, at a risk of stating 
> > the obvious (and I'm 99.99% sure I am), does backend code need to be 
> > submitted as C even if it's for an entirely NEW module?
> 
> Backend code must be C; we do not want to deal with C++ portability
> issues.

Is it something that could be in /conrib?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib/ltree for 7.2 or 7.3 ?
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] prepareable statements