Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable
Date
Msg-id 2790.1432150635@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> That does cover all bases, and users would be able to create the
> operator which suits their particular use case easily.  It's also fairly
> similar to how jsquery works, although the syntax is completely different.

> But ... it's after feature freeze.  So, thoughts?

I think this could be seen as a correction/bug fix for a pre-freeze
feature.  We should not be too resistant to filing down rough edges
on new features, even if that involves a spec change.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: anole: assorted stability problems