On 2015-05-20 15:37:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > That does cover all bases, and users would be able to create the
> > operator which suits their particular use case easily. It's also fairly
> > similar to how jsquery works, although the syntax is completely different.
>
> > But ... it's after feature freeze. So, thoughts?
>
> I think this could be seen as a correction/bug fix for a pre-freeze
> feature. We should not be too resistant to filing down rough edges
> on new features, even if that involves a spec change.
+1
