Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZjvnE=t41k5PCPfcroSthOME34WcB2Dyctx=rSQjqkEQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2015-05-20 15:37:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> > That does cover all bases, and users would be able to create the
>> > operator which suits their particular use case easily.  It's also fairly
>> > similar to how jsquery works, although the syntax is completely different.
>>
>> > But ... it's after feature freeze.  So, thoughts?
>>
>> I think this could be seen as a correction/bug fix for a pre-freeze
>> feature.  We should not be too resistant to filing down rough edges
>> on new features, even if that involves a spec change.
>
> +1

+1, emphatically.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)
Next
From: Oleksandr Shulgin
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump quietly ignore missing tables - is it bug?