Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Basically a Wiki takes 10x more time for me to modify something, so
>> unless I get another 9 people to do the same amount of work I do on
>> tracking, we are going to fall behind. I am not willing to increase the
>> amount of time I already spend doing this. Perhaps distributed over the
>> community there will be 9x more time spent on tracking, but I doubt it.
> On a busy day we might get 5 patches submitted or updated. That's five lines
> of text to add or edit.
I think what Bruce is really complaining about here is that he's got
years worth of development in his current infrastructure, and so it only
costs him a few seconds and keystrokes to push stuff into his existing
patch queue; while there's no such shortcuts for the wiki. Which is a
fair complaint, but it's hardly insoluble.
> The hard part is reading the email and figuring out
> what status the patch is in.
Certainly. What we've got to do is make sure that after someone has
made that decision, it doesn't cost them a couple of minutes of drudgery
to look up the appropriate email-archives URL and push it into the wiki
page (probably with a comment). I can't imagine that this is terribly
difficult, but web page scripting isn't one of my strengths ...
regards, tom lane
