Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Oops, I just noticed that the fix is very simple in HEAD and 9.3 because
> we can just add the appropriate case labels to the already existing
> generic object alter-owner case. But in 9.2, we not only need to add
> extra cases to cover each object, but we also need to refactor
> the appropriate AlterOwner routine to work on OID input rather than name
> only. In other words we need the equivalent of
> 0c7b9dc7d037c4465227dc2300ff48019feeba37 for each of the text search
> object types :-(
> Not sure I have the time to do all that right now. Contributions
> welcome.
Given the lack of complaints to date, maybe fixing it in 9.3/HEAD is
sufficient. I'd certainly rather see those branches get fixed now,
and 9.2 later, than nothing happen at all for a long time. It's also
arguable that back-patching such a large change into 9.2 is more risk
than the problem is worth.
regards, tom lane
