Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Oops, I just noticed that the fix is very simple in HEAD and 9.3 because
> > we can just add the appropriate case labels to the already existing
> > generic object alter-owner case. But in 9.2, we not only need to add
> > extra cases to cover each object, but we also need to refactor
> > the appropriate AlterOwner routine to work on OID input rather than name
> > only. In other words we need the equivalent of
> > 0c7b9dc7d037c4465227dc2300ff48019feeba37 for each of the text search
> > object types :-(
>
> > Not sure I have the time to do all that right now. Contributions
> > welcome.
>
> Given the lack of complaints to date, maybe fixing it in 9.3/HEAD is
> sufficient. I'd certainly rather see those branches get fixed now,
> and 9.2 later, than nothing happen at all for a long time. It's also
> arguable that back-patching such a large change into 9.2 is more risk
> than the problem is worth.
Just pushed a fix for all branches.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
