Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4?
Date
Msg-id 26884.1130475813@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4?  (Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com>)
Responses Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4?
List pgsql-hackers
Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com> writes:
> Hmmm... is it feasible to make the error message a little more useful?
> People who didn't use the old-style positional parameters might not
> understand where $1 and $2 are coming from.

Not sure how --- the arm's-length relationship between plpgsql and the
main parser hurts us here.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89)
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: SOLVED Re: _penalty gist method invoked with one key