Re: SOLVED Re: _penalty gist method invoked with one key - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oleg Bartunov
Subject Re: SOLVED Re: _penalty gist method invoked with one key
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.63.0510280936000.29329@ra.sai.msu.su
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SOLVED Re: _penalty gist method invoked with one key  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: SOLVED Re: _penalty gist method invoked with one key
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> Grzegorz - it'd be great if you submitted documentation improvements :)

I don't see any GiST specific problem in Grzegorz's case.

>
> Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
>> Sorry for all this crap, this is bullocks.
>> reason was, one of internal functions didn't filled out length value,  and 
>> since the type is variable length, we had trouble.
>> Postgres wasn't copying anything, since length was 0, hence the NULL - 
>> >key.
>> So here's little request. Could someone please put ASSERT somewhere  that 
>> would make it visible to ppl that are as stupid as me, and  forgot to fill 
>> that field out?
>> Would be great, me myself I have no idea where it should go really.
>> 
>> Thanks again.
>> 
>> p.s.. yeah, good docs on gist are still missing, I mean tutorial, or 
>> really really good docs.
>> I have to thank here to AndrewSN for all the help, and have enough 
>> patience to help me, even through I sometimes ask too many stupid 
>> questions, or simply try to do stuff my way, rather than use his very  good 
>> suggestions. Thank You.
>> 
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
    Regards,        Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4?
Next
From: Philip Yarra
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4?