Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Yarra
Subject Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4?
Date
Msg-id 200510281541.10219.philip@utiba.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/pgsql breakage in 8.1b4?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:03 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com> writes:
> > Hmmm... is it feasible to make the error message a little more useful?
> > People who didn't use the old-style positional parameters might not
> > understand where $1 and $2 are coming from.
>
> Not sure how --- the arm's-length relationship between plpgsql and the
> main parser hurts us here.

Yeah, I had a suspicion the answer might be along those lines. 

Well, here's a minor doco patch against HEAD to at least record this with the 
Oracle PL/sql -> PL/pgSQL porting notes. 

Regards, Philip.

-----------------
Utiba Pty Ltd 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is 
believed to be clean.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: SOLVED Re: _penalty gist method invoked with one key
Next
From: Gregory Maxwell
Date:
Subject: Re: enums