Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Erik Rijkers
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id 25965310c10b4d07bab2fd3c880135a3.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, February 16, 2013 02:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> matview-v4.patch.gz

Hi,

I was wondering if material views should not go into information_schema.  I was thinking either
.views or .tables.  Have you considered this?

I ask because as far as I can see querying for mv's has to go like this:

SELECT n.nspname, c.relname
FROM pg_catalog.pg_class c
LEFT JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
WHERE c.relkind IN ('m','')
  and n.nspname = 'myschema'

which seems rather ugly.


Also, some documentation typos: please see attached.


Thanks,

Erik Rijkers




Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gurjeet Singh
Date:
Subject: Patch to make pgindent work cleanly
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch