Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id 20130219222226.GD5670@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  ("Erik Rijkers" <er@xs4all.nl>)
Responses Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:09:13PM +0100, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On Sat, February 16, 2013 02:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > matview-v4.patch.gz
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering if material views should not go into information_schema.  I was thinking either
> .views or .tables.  Have you considered this?

I'm guessing it'd be .views if anything.  Haven't been able to
decipher from section 11 of the standard (Schemata) whether the
standard has anything to say on the matter.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch