Re: Bug in Function-Transactions? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug in Function-Transactions?
Date
Msg-id 25315.1033755473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Bug in Function-Transactions?  ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
"Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Postgres terminated my back-end connection to the server when it
> reached the VACUUM statement.

> Next, I reconnected. I was quite surprised to discover that Postgres
> had *not* rolled back the changes made by the function before it
> crashed.

Yeah.  The problem here is precisely that VACUUM does internal commits
--- so it committed your function's earlier changes too.  When you
returned from the VACUUM, the function's execution context was gone
as a byproduct of post-commit cleanup.  Oops.  VACUUM is disallowed
inside functions as of 7.3 to prevent this problem.

I don't think you need to be too worried about database corruption
as a result of this experiment, fortunately.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bigint and indexes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug #789: Transaction Archival Logging -- Hot Backups