Re: bigint and indexes - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bigint and indexes
Date
Msg-id 25221.1033754950@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to bigint and indexes  ("Bill Schneider" <bschneider@vecna.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
"Bill Schneider" <bschneider@vecna.com> writes:
> This seems to be a well-known and documented issue.  Are there already plans
> to fix this in an upcoming release?

Yes.

> Is the problem here in the optimizer itself, or in the parser?

The problem is that the query is interpreted as "int8col int84eq int4const"
and int84eq is not one of the operators in the index's opclass.  The
planned fix is to get rid of int84eq (and most other cross-datatype
operators) so that the parser is forced to select plain int8eq and
up-convert the literal to int8.

See past discussions of numeric coercion rules in pgsql-hackers archives
if you want to know more about why this is a difficult issue.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.3B2 initdb fails
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in Function-Transactions?