Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date
Msg-id 25150.1188849627@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>)
Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  ("Liam O'Duibhir" <liamod@fast.fujitsu.com.au>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
>> subset of the community most interested in this change and least
>> interested in the ensuing costs.

> It seems there were a significant number of people with swag who will
> pay the cost somehow.

That's adopting exactly the view I thought it was, that only directly
marketing-related costs matter.  Again, this seems to be considering
only advocacy-related concerns.

I'll confine my reply to one point: do you have any idea what will
happen if I try to change the default PGDATA location on Red Hat
from /var/lib/pgsql to something else?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: Change the name (was: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL))
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)