Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date
Msg-id 200709031951.l83Jp2602129@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > This shows 70% in favor of a change to "Postgres", so far.
>
> Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the
> subset of the community most interested in this change and least
> interested in the ensuing costs.

It seems there were a significant number of people with swag who will
pay the cost somehow.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: A renaming analogy
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)