Re: installcheck-world concurrency issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: installcheck-world concurrency issues
Date
Msg-id 20221005172027.bbcqtbfrwx6wktyw@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: installcheck-world concurrency issues  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-10-05 08:16:37 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 04.10.22 01:41, Andres Freund wrote:
> > BTW, shouldn't src/test/modules/unsafe_tests use the PG_TEST_EXTRA mechanism
> > somehow?  Seems not great to run it as part of installcheck-world, if we don't
> > want to run it as part of installcheck.
> 
> I think there are different levels and kinds of unsafeness. The ssl and
> kerberos tests start open server processes on your machine.  The
> modules/unsafe_tests just make a mess of your postgres instance.  The latter
> isn't a problem when run against a temp instance.

I agree - but I suspect our definition of danger is reversed. For me breaking
an existing cluster is a lot more likely to incur "real world" danger than
starting a throway instance listening to tcp on localhost...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: archive modules