Hi,
On 2022-09-12 21:12:03 +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
> >> I think this is localized enough that asking people to manually resolve a
> >> conflict around adding a GUC entry wouldn't be asking for that much. And I
> >> think plenty changes might be automatically resolvable, despite the rename.
> >
> > I wonder whether git will be able to figure out that this is mostly a
> > code move. I would expect so for a straight file rename, but will that
> > work when we're splitting the file 3 ways?
>
> Git can detect more complicated code movement (see the `--color-moved`
> option to `git diff`), but I'm not sure it's clever enough to realise
> that a change modifying a block of code that was moved in the meanwhile
> should be applied at the new destination.
It sometimes can for large code movements, but not in this case. I think
because guc.c is more self-similar than guc_tables.c.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
