On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:12:00PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:51 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > OK, here they are with numeric prefixes. It was actually tricky to
> > figure out how to create a squashed format-patch based on another branch.
>
> Thank you for attaching the patches. It passes all cfbot tests, great.
Yeah, I saw that. :-) I head to learn a lot about how to create
squashed format-patches on non-master branches. I have now automated it
so it will be easy going forward.
> Looking at the patch, it supports three algorithms but only
> PG_CIPHER_AES_KWP is used in the core for now:
>
> +/*
> + * Supported symmetric encryption algorithm. These identifiers are passed
> + * to pg_cipher_ctx_create() function, and then actual encryption
> + * implementations need to initialize their context of the given encryption
> + * algorithm.
> + */
> +#define PG_CIPHER_AES_GCM 0
> +#define PG_CIPHER_AES_KW 1
> +#define PG_CIPHER_AES_KWP 2
> +#define PG_MAX_CIPHER_ID 3
>
> Are we in the process of experimenting which algorithms are better? If
> we support one algorithm that is actually used in the core, we would
> reduce the tests as well.
I think we are only using KWP (Key Wrap with Padding) because that is
for wrapping keys:
https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Projects/Cryptographic-Algorithm-Validation-Program/documents/mac/KWVS.pdf
I am not sure about KW. I think we are using GCM for the WAP/heap/index
pages. Stephen would know more.
> FWIW, I've written a PoC patch for buffer encryption to make sure the
> kms patch would be workable with other components using the encryption
> key managed by kmgr.
Wow, it is a small patch --- nice.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
