Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
Date
Msg-id 20200803.181756.829161885489632565.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Uggg.

At Mon, 03 Aug 2020 16:19:37 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in 
> At Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:53:53 -0700, Henry B Hotz <hbhotz@oxy.edu> wrote in 
> > A CA may issue a CRL infrequently, but issue a delta-CRL frequently. Does the logic support this properly?
> 
> If you are talking about regsitering new revokations while server is
> running, it checks newer CRLs upon each lookup according to the
> documentation [1], so a new Delta-CRL can be added after server
> start. If server restart is allowed, the CRL file specified by

I didin't know that ssl files are reloaded by SIGHUP (pg_ctl
reload). So the ssl_crl_file is also reloaded on server reload.

> ssl_crl_file can contain multiple CRLs by just concatenation.
> 
> [1]: https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.1/man3/X509_LOOKUP_hash_dir.html

Still on-demand loading is the advantage of the hashed directory
method.  I'll continue working..

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path
Next
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY FREEZE and setting PD_ALL_VISIBLE/visibility map bits