Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvqWaQvzUPrPMZ7vYcVwzRFP+zbQwhdQ630xgUVBj0O2Wg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Keep elog(ERROR) and ereport(ERROR) calls in the cold path  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 19:54, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Worth noting that the patch set fails to apply.  I have moved this
> entry to the next CF, waiting on author.

Thanks.

NB: It's not a patch set. It's 3 different versions of the patch.
They're not all meant to apply at once. Probably the CF bot wasn't
aware of that though :-(

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?