Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
Date
Msg-id 20200803.161937.1339154153081066325.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?  (Henry B Hotz <hbhotz@oxy.edu>)
Responses Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
At Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:53:53 -0700, Henry B Hotz <hbhotz@oxy.edu> wrote in 
> A CA may issue a CRL infrequently, but issue a delta-CRL frequently. Does the logic support this properly?

If you are talking about regsitering new revokations while server is
running, it checks newer CRLs upon each lookup according to the
documentation [1], so a new Delta-CRL can be added after server
start. If server restart is allowed, the CRL file specified by
ssl_crl_file can contain multiple CRLs by just concatenation.

[1]: https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.1/man3/X509_LOOKUP_hash_dir.html

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "movead.li@highgo.ca"
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?