Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++
Date
Msg-id 20200313061234.GA120686@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:43:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't feel a need to expend a whole lot of sweat there.  The existing
> text is fine, it just bugged me that the code deals with three cases
> while the comment block only acknowledged two.  So I'd just go with
> what you have in v3.

Thanks, Tom.  I have committed v3 then.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip llvm bytecode generation if LLVM is missing
Next
From: "imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)